To A Nation Under Siege: Happy 2009
Posted on December 28th, 2008
by Kelley Vlahos |
|
Among other incredulous assertions made by Rich Lowry on NBC’s Meet the Press today — which include that it was really the fault of the western liberal that post-invasion Iraq was such a catastrophic mess — he attempts to bolster the growing meme that as a wartime president, a passionate wartime president, one of George Bush’s greatest achievements was to prevent another attack on American soil. There has been much made over this in the post-election political climate. In fact, it is a favorite trope utilized by Veep Dick Cheney, who like the ghost of Jacob Marley, is constantly rattling around this claim as the unforgiving chains of near-history threaten to bind him forever — and he knows it.
To be sure, barring the still-unsolved anthrax incidents post-9/11, there hasn’t been another terrorist attack on American soil. What does that mean? It means that the whole of local, state and federal power has been marshaled on an unprecedented level to create a domestic security infrastructure that has, until this moment, deterred foreign attacks. In plain terms, we have made it undesirable, if not impossible, for terrorism to occur today on the scale of September 11, 2001. As taxpayers, we have spent billions of dollars, and given up many of our civil liberties. We have surrendered to humiliating security procedures and no doubt will have to endure more as the government invents new procedures to make security more convenient for them, while more invasive for us. It will not end, and the whole of this new domestic “homeland” security will have to be maintained, whatever the cost, well beyond the outgoing administration.
Why? Google up today’s news and it tells you everything. The headlines for December 28, 2008:
“Israel tanks mass near Gaza as jets pound Hamas”
“US: 14 students die in bombing at Afghan school”
“Tensions Rise as Pakistan Moves to Redeploy Troops”
“Car Bombs Kills at Least 30 in Pakistan”
“Car Bomb Kills 2, Wounds 4 in Iraq”
ADD: “Baghdad Car Bombing Kills at Least 22, Injures More Than 50″
“Violent protests at Israeli Embassy in London”
“Across the Middle East, Thousands Protest Israeli Assaults”
Conditions on the world stage are more fragile, more unpredictable, more out of our control than after the 9/11 attacks that precipitated the siege mentality here at home and two U.S military invasions abroad. The Bush Administration has failed in its promise to help make the world a safer place, a freer place for oppressed individuals and those threatened by political violence. While Rich Lowry brags on Bush’s behalf that the “surge” in Iraq was a “highly courageous act,” successfully thwarting al Qaeda, he conveniently ignores that al Qaeda never existed in Iraq until the U.S invaded, and is now thriving through bastardized groups in the Middle East, South Asia and North Africa.
But that is beside the point — which is our safety at home came at a very high cost. A cost that will turn into endless annual payments until conditions abroad change. Bush not only failed to achieve the required change, he made it worse. We may have prevented more deaths on “American soil,” but as citizens of the world, we have taken many hits since 9/11. As leaders of “the free world,” the Bush Administration has done little to encourage human rights among the dictators who continue to be counted as allies, and the number of people who want to ultimately do us harm has not diminished.
So, we continue to “go shopping,” as a country under siege. Today’s headlines indicate nothing has changed. The worst we can do now is ignore the aftershocks of the Bush Administration’s mistakes and allow its fading courtier class, including the likes of Rich Lowry, to rewrite history — or worse, continuously misrepresent our current crises — for their own partisan benefit.
Filed under: Foreign policy, Iraq, War, World
“To be sure, barring the still-unsolved anthrax incidents post-9/11, there hasn’t been another terrorist attack on American soil.”
Except that simply isn’t true. There hasn’t been a large-scale terrorist attack on American soil since 9/11, true but there have been numerous smaller incidents all over the country. This lie is repeated and sustained because all these incidents have been classified as “not terrorist related” pretty much immediately by federal law enforcement.
Here’s a partial list:
3/19/2002 USA Tuscon, AZ 1 0 A 60-year-old man is gunned down by Muslim snipers on a golf course.
5/27/2002 USA Denton, TX 1 0 Muslim snipers kill a man as he works in his yard.
7/4/2002 USA Los Angeles, CA 2 0 Muslim man pulls out a gun at the counter of an Israeli airline and kills two people.
9/5/2002 USA Clinton, MD 1 0 A 55-year-old pizzaria owner is shot six times in the back by Muslims at close range.
9/21/2002 USA Montgomery, AL 1 1 Muslim snipers shoot two women, killing one.
9/23/2002 USA Baton Rouge, LA 1 0 A Korean mother is shot in the back by Muslim snipers.
10/2/2002 USA Wheaton, MD 1 0 Muslim snipers gun down a program analyst in a store parking lot.
10/3/2002 USA Montgomery County, MD 5 0 Muslim snipers kill three men and two women in separate attacks over a 15-hour period.
10/9/2002 USA Manassas, VA 1 1 A man is killed by Muslim snipers while pumping gas two days after a 13-year-old is wounded by the same team.
10/11/2002 USA Fredericksburg, VA 1 0 Another man is killed by Muslim snipers while pumping gas.
10/14/2002 USA Arlington, VA 1 0 A woman is killed by Muslim snipers in a Home Depot parking lot.
10/22/2002 USA Aspen Hill, MD 1 0 A bus driver is killed by Muslim snipers.
8/6/2003 USA Houston, TX 1 0 After undergoing a religious revival, a Saudi college student slashes the throat of a Jewish student with a 4″ butterfly knife, nearly decapitating the young man.
4/13/2004 USA Raleigh, NC 1 4 A Muslim man runs down five strangers with a car.
6/16/2006 USA Baltimore, MD 1 0 A 62-year-old Jewish moviegoer is shot to death by a Muslim gunman in an unprovoked terror attack.
6/25/2006 USA Denver, CO 1 5 Saying that it was ‘Allah’s choice’, a Muslim shoots four of his co-workers and a police officer.
7/28/2006 USA Seattle, WA 1 5 An ‘angry’ Muslim-American barges into a local Jewish center and shoots six women, one of whom dies.
2/13/2007 USA Salt Lake City, UT 5 4 A Muslim immigrant goes on a shooting rampage at a mall, targeting people buying Valentine’s Day cards at a gift shop and killing five.
And that mantra about having prevented another attack also conveniently distracts from the fact that it *was* under Bush that the 9/11 attackers succeeded, with Richard Clarke having noted how idiotically the Bushies had downgraded our anti-terrorist measures almost immediately upon taking office. (In favor, it seems—also rather immediately —of thinking about getting into a war with Saddam.)
As with FDR and Pearl Harbor though, it seems that almost no matter the degree of their negligence, we give our Presidents at least one free one in things like this.
Rich Lowry must have a whole pantry full of tiger repellent at home.
Kevin is right.
Neocons like Denis Prager loudly complained at the time these attacks occurred that these events were not classified as terrorism. Now they say there have been no terrorist attacks. Neocons have no credibility in these matters.
It pains me to say this, but in fairness to Bush, I have to agree that there have been no terror attacks in the US since 9/11. Implied in this discussion of terrorism is that the actions are linked to al-Qaeda, or at least are coordinated in some manner.
Some of the incidents cited by Kevin are from the DC sniper attacks. One sniper was a member of the Nation of Islam (ie, Black Muslims) and the other was his teenage assistant. One could argue their motives were political, but I think a stronger argument can be made that they were plain nuts. I don’t think you could tie them to ‘terrorism’, in the sense Bushies use, any more than you could tie the actions of any Irish murderer to the IRA.
I would argue the reason the US has been terror free since 9/11 is because there aren’t many terrorists. The hatred and despair prevalent in the Mideast does seem to produce a steady stream of people willing to make themselves human bombs, but where hope exists only the most fanatic will sacrifice themselves.
There are about a billion Muslims in the world, and millions in the West. If even a tiny fraction wanted to commit terror, and were willing to lose their lives, they could make life hell. It may take a generation or two, but I think the US reaction to 9/11 will be seen as an hysterical overreaction - exactly the reaction terrorists hope to provoke.
[...] To a Nation Under Siege: Happy 2009 by Kelley Vlahos [...]