Bibi Wins, Barack Loses

On Sept. 20, 2002, as the War Party was beating the drum for preventive war on Iraq, lest we wake up to “a mushroom cloud over an American city,” The Wall Street Journal introduced an eminent voice to confirm that, yes, Saddam was driving straight for an atomic bomb.

“This is a dictator who is … feverishly trying to acquire nuclear weapons,” wrote Bibi Netanyahu, former prime minister of Israel.

“Saddam’s nuclear program has changed. He no longer needs one large reactor to produce the deadly material necessary for atomic bombs. He can produce it in centrifuges the size of washing machines that can be hidden throughout the country — and Iraq is a very big country. Even free and unfettered inspections will not uncover these portable manufacturing sites of mass death. …

“(I)f action is not taken now, we will all be threatened by a much greater peril … (for) no gas mask and no vaccine can protect against nuclear weapons.”

This was horse manure of a high grade, as high as that which Richard Perle deposited on the podium of the Foreign Policy Research Institute a year earlier, when he informed a stunned audience that Saddam “is busily at work on a nuclear weapon.”

Perle had it straight from Saddam’s “Bomb Maker,” “a man named Kadir Hamza.” Hamza, said Perle, told him that after the Osirak reactor was destroyed by Israel in 1981, Saddam “began to build uranium enrichment facilities, many facilities, and we built 400 of them, and they’re all over the country. Some of them look like farmhouses, some of them look like classrooms, some of them look like warehouses. You’ll never find them. They don’t turn out much, but every day they turn out a little bit of nuclear materials.”

“So,” Perle warned his riveted audience, “it’s simply a matter of time before he acquires nuclear weapons.”

Washing-machine centrifuges in uranium enrichment facilities disguised as barns and chicken coops! And Americans believed it. And so we were stampeded into war against a nation that did not threaten or attack us, to strip it of weapons it did not even have.

That war has cost 4,500 American dead and 35,000 wounded. It has brought death to perhaps a hundred thousand Iraqis. Four million people have been driven from their homes, 2 million, including half the Christians, into exile. Hundreds of thousands of fatherless Iraqi children are being raised by women widowed by that war.

Undaunted, the War Party has a new war planned for us.

Target: Tehran. And Obama may just have boxed himself in.

In return for Bibi’s willingness to talk to the Palestinians, Obama agreed to a December deadline for progress in talks with Iran. If the talks are not fruitful by then, America will step on the escalator.

“I’ve been very clear that I don’t take any options off the table with respect to Iran,” said the president.

Bibi got what he came for.

By setting a six-month deadline, Obama has given an incentive to Israel, AIPAC, the neocons, and even al-Qaeda, which wants Shia Iran bombed back to the stone age, to provoke collisions with Iran, until December, then demand that Obama keep his word, suspend talks, impose severe sanctions and start us on the escalator to war.

And, already, the incidents are multiplying.

Iran’s supreme leader, the Ayatollah Khamenei, has charged the United States with complicity in cross-border attacks from Kurdistan. Israel threatens Iran almost daily and practices bombing runs to Greece and Gibraltar. Iran says it can destroy Israel and tests a missile that can hit that nation.

Israel claims Iran is trucking weapons into Gaza via Sudan. But how the trucks get through Egypt, cross the Red Sea and Sinai, then pass through Israeli and Egyptian checkpoints is unexplained.

Hillary Clinton yesterday called an Iranian nuclear capability an “extraordinary threat” and said the U.S. goal is “to persuade the Iranian regime that they will actually be less secure if they proceed with their nuclear weapons program.”

Query: What nuclear weapons program?

According to the National Intelligence Estimate of 2007, Iran halted its weapons program in 2003. Nor are there any reports of the diversion of Iran’s industrial-grade uranium from Natanz or evidence of any secret centrifuge cascade to enrich it to weapons grade.

According to the Los Angeles Times, the EastWest Institute of Russian and U.S. scientists says Tehran is “at least six years away from building a deliverable nuclear weapon,” and a Rand Corp. study says that Iran’s “ability to wreak havoc in the Middle East through surrogates is exaggerated.”

Iran represents no threat to the United States to justify a war.

And as Korea finished Harry Truman, Vietnam finished LBJ, and Iraq finished the Bush Republicans, war with Iran would make Barack — with the situations in Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq all deteriorating — a one-term president.

Barack had best understand. The crowd manipulating him into war with Iran has in mind, first, obliterating Iran; second, getting rid of him.

COPYRIGHT 2009 CREATORS SYNDICATE INC.

9 Responses to “Bibi Wins, Barack Loses”

  1. Your right again Pat. However, I think Obama’s smarter than that. With the press conference with Bibi, he said straight out, two state settlement and stopping the building on the west bank. I think he’s trying to appease the right wingers right now, I’m more worried about congress not backing him.

  2. Can one make a case for AIPAC to register as a Foreign Agent? Is anyone working toward this goal? This seems to me the best path to take at this time.

  3. Maybe I’m too optimistic, but I think the option of war against Iran has been taken off the table and Bibi firmly told that in private. Bush and the neo-cons were prevented from attacking Iran by the inner establishment, the military/industrial/security complex which runs the US and wants global empire, but not at the price of nuclear war in the Middle East, perhaps including war with Russia. Obama may not be able to force Bibi’s hand with the Palestinians, but neither he nor the establishment want to have to deal with the results of an Israeli attack on Iran.

  4. Great article, Mr. PJB.

    “… And so we were stampeded into war against a nation that did not threaten or attack us, to strip it of weapons it did not even have.”

    The parties responsible for so doing should be held accountable. To date, amazingly, none have.

    We owe it every single soldier maimed in Iraq – and the families of those killed therein – to hold accountable those who led us to believe that Saddam’s Iraq was linked to 9-11, and was a grave and immediate threat to America.

    Justice must be served. Lest we forget.

  5. Kirt,

    Some people think that the neocons were prevented from giving the go-ahead to an Israeli strike on Iran by virtue of Bush’s refusal to support it.

    It is possible that all the “elites” got together and decided not to have a war. It is also possible that GWB got one thing right and (belatedly) stood up to the hawks in his own administration.

    http://www.amconmag.com/blog/2009/02/05/bushs-good-deed/

    I don’t know which story to believe, but I am happy that there are two out there, and I’d like to think that Bush finally got one right.

  6. AIPAC: Arrogant Israelites Pulling America’s Chain.

  7. The problem with intelligence information, is that it is a “leaky bucket”, in that it ages quickly.

    Like people do. People with an agenda. And with old intelligence.

    Problem with people getting old, is: the agenda remains, but the intelligence-gathering activity whithers.

    Let’s suppose you’re right. Then NO PROBLEM. That’s where BUSH and his ADMINISTRATION were BEFORE 9/11.

    But if we buy your “take” on the global situation, then we better hope that Obama is rapidly BEEFING UP the US INTELLIGENCE operation globally.

    That would help the US sort fiction from fact, worry from danger:

    http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/05/19/opinion/main5026448.shtml

  8. Great article Pat. What I think is extremely important is to examine the US media laws and whether they are being violated by AIPAC and people like Mort Zuckerman. The same cast of characters which started Iraqtophobia and hard a work about Iran. Iran poses no threat to the U.S. and it’s interests in the region. Israel is a different story.

  9. “Barack had best understand. The crowd manipulating him into war with Iran has in mind, first, obliterating Iran; second, getting rid of him.”

    I am intellectually indebted to Mr. Patrick J. Buchanan for his telling the truth all along and who has not sold his soul for big money in America.

    The above mentioned quote tells all that we needed to know.

    However, just to add to Mr. Buchanan’s writing…

    America never attacks a country that has political will to defend itself with nuclear weapons of mass destruction.

    History is guide, America always attacks a country that does not have nuclear weapons of mass destruction.

    Pres. Bush did not attack Iran not because he had deeply seated love for it, but because it would have been too costly for America to do so.

    Israel always wants America do its dirty work notwithstanding the fact that hundreds of billions of U.S. tax-payers dollars are annually poured into that socialist state!

    In any case, I strongly believe we need many more Patrick J. Buchanans in this nation and around the world.

Leave a Reply