<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bush Told the Truth</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amconmag.com/blog/2009/09/15/bush-told-the-truth/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amconmag.com/blog/2009/09/15/bush-told-the-truth/</link>
	<description>@TAC</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 21 Mar 2010 04:53:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: David Lee Evans</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/blog/2009/09/15/bush-told-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-11762</link>
		<dc:creator>David Lee Evans</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 20:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2158#comment-11762</guid>
		<description>Daniel McCarthy stated.
&quot;...There hasn’t been a “conservative movement” for a long time: there’s a Republican auxiliary that calls itself conservative and a movement. It’s arguable, though, whether Bush redefined it or merely pushed the absurdity to its logical conclusion.&quot;

It seems that most of G.W. Bushes big policies decisions, Iraqi liberation/invasion and the inadequate support for the war on terror and the occupation of  Afghanistan have  biases, toward the neo-conservative political agendas, and lets not examine the skewed, non-conservative domestic policies; My guess is that  G.W. Bushes did not pushed  the conservative movement, but he and  the military industrial complex and neo-cons walked hand in hand across that rainbow, that leads straight to OZ.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel McCarthy stated.<br />
&#8220;&#8230;There hasn’t been a “conservative movement” for a long time: there’s a Republican auxiliary that calls itself conservative and a movement. It’s arguable, though, whether Bush redefined it or merely pushed the absurdity to its logical conclusion.&#8221;</p>
<p>It seems that most of G.W. Bushes big policies decisions, Iraqi liberation/invasion and the inadequate support for the war on terror and the occupation of  Afghanistan have  biases, toward the neo-conservative political agendas, and lets not examine the skewed, non-conservative domestic policies; My guess is that  G.W. Bushes did not pushed  the conservative movement, but he and  the military industrial complex and neo-cons walked hand in hand across that rainbow, that leads straight to OZ.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremiah Whitmoore</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/blog/2009/09/15/bush-told-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-9676</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremiah Whitmoore</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 06:27:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2158#comment-9676</guid>
		<description>Bush is definitely post-right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bush is definitely post-right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crunchy Con</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/blog/2009/09/15/bush-told-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-9670</link>
		<dc:creator>Crunchy Con</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 21:26:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2158#comment-9670</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Bush smarter than professional conservatives...&lt;/strong&gt;

TAC&#039;s Daniel McCarthy repeats a telling political anecdote from the Bush White House, as reported by a former speechwriter who has just written a memoir. Daniel&#039;s conclusion reflects well on Bush&#039;s political judgment (no kidding): But [the anecdote]...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Bush smarter than professional conservatives&#8230;</strong></p>
<p>TAC&#8217;s Daniel McCarthy repeats a telling political anecdote from the Bush White House, as reported by a former speechwriter who has just written a memoir. Daniel&#8217;s conclusion reflects well on Bush&#8217;s political judgment (no kidding): But [the anecdote]&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Casey Khan</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/blog/2009/09/15/bush-told-the-truth/comment-page-1/#comment-9659</link>
		<dc:creator>Casey Khan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2009 12:21:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/blog/?p=2158#comment-9659</guid>
		<description>W is brilliant, and has always been elite.  The worst part of his legacy, however, was that he pretended to be some kind of redneck Texan hellraiser, to wit many took to be genuine.  In any case, he played his part and made the world safe for war, torture, and abortion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>W is brilliant, and has always been elite.  The worst part of his legacy, however, was that he pretended to be some kind of redneck Texan hellraiser, to wit many took to be genuine.  In any case, he played his part and made the world safe for war, torture, and abortion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
