In France, of all places, work-related stress is driving increasing numbers to suicide, and in offices everywhere the recession is causing gloom. The Economist's Schumpeter column nicely breaks down the problem, though his (her?) conclusion - that low birth rates will ultimately cure worker woes -- seems highly dubious.

Stress is Killing

By Schumpeter

SUICIDE, proclaimed Albert Camus in “The Myth of Sisyphus”, is the only serious philosophical problem. In France at the moment it is also a serious management problem. A spate of attempted and successful suicides at France Telecom—many of them explicitly prompted by troubles at work—has sparked a national debate about life in the modern corporation. One man stabbed himself in the middle of a meeting (he survived). A woman leapt from a fourth-floor office window after sending a suicidal e-mail to her father: “I have decided to kill myself tonight…I can’t take the new reorganisation.” In all, 24 of the firm’s employees have taken their own lives since early 2008—and this grisly tally follows similar episodes at other pillars of French industry including Renault, Peugeot and EDF (see article).

There are some parochial reasons for this melancholy trend. France Telecom is making the difficult transition from state monopoly to multinational company. It has shed 22,000 jobs since 2006, but two-thirds of the remaining workers enjoy civil-service-like job-security. This is forcing it to pursue a toxic strategy: teaching old civil servants new tricks while at the same time putting new hires on short-term contracts. Yet the problem is not confined to France. America’s Bureau of Labour Statistics calculates that work-related suicides increased by 28% between 2007 and 2008, although the rate is lower than in Europe. And suicide is only the tip of an iceberg of work-related unhappiness.

A survey by the Centre for Work-Life Policy, an American consultancy, found that between June 2007 and December 2008 the proportion of employees who professed loyalty to their employers slumped from 95% to 39%; the number voicing trust in them fell from 79% to 22%. A more recent survey by DDI, another American consultancy, found that more than half of respondents described their job as “stagnant”, meaning that they had nothing interesting to do and little hope of promotion. Half of these “stagnators” planned to look for another job as soon as the economy improved. People are both clinging on to their current jobs, however much they dislike them, and dreaming of moving when the economy improves. This is taking a toll on both short-term productivity and long-term competitiveness: the people most likely to move when things look up are high-flyers who feel that their talents are being ignored.

 

Read Full Article...


© 2009 The Economist

 

 


Too Much or Too Little Democracy?
By Oskar Chomicki - November 20, 2009

TGIF: The Mandated Health Insurance Outrage
By Sheldon Richman - November 20, 2009
More


A Sure Path To Self-Destruction
November 20, 2009 - Comments: 8

The Serious People And The Fringe
November 19, 2009 - Comments: 2
More


P.S.
November 04, 2009

On Hiatus
November 03, 2009 - Comments: 4
More


The Trouble With Disraeli
November 13, 2009 - Comments: 4

Asymmetrical Politics
November 05, 2009 - Comments: 4
More

Are The Republicans Stupak?
By David Lindsay - November 20, 2009
Comments: 1


Lou Dobbs: "Bring Our Troops Home"
By Jack Hunter - November 20, 2009
Comments: 3

More

 

 

 

Using technology licensed from Unz.org, one or more U.S. and foreign patents pending
Letters@amconmag.com
The American Conservative
1300 Wilson Boulevard Suite 120
Arlington, VA 22209