Posted on July 31st, 2005 by Daniel Larison
The discovery was announced by US scientists yesterday and the object has unofficially been named Xena, after the TV series starring Lucy Lawless. ‘We have always wanted to name something Xena,’ said Michael Brown, a member of the team that made the discovery using telescopes at the Palomar Observatory, outside San Diego, California. ~The Observer
This […]
2 Comments »
Filed under: miscellaneous
Posted on July 31st, 2005 by Daniel Larison
Jon Stewart of The Daily Show was recently interviewed by NPR (see also this older interview), and (perhaps like Matt Taibbi) I think the man may be a minor Pantagruelist. His remarks about mainstream media journalism imply a positive rejection of its pretense of liberal neutrality. Perhaps this bodes well for the future, as mainstream […]
No Comments »
Filed under: politics
Posted on July 30th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
Since the Byzantines were often keen to point out that it was at Byzantium that the Ten Thousand first found real refuge from the pursuit of the Persians and the hostility of locals, it seems fitting that my first post after my return from my so-called anabasis touch on something related to Byzantium.
Thomas […]
2 Comments »
Filed under: miscellaneous
Posted on July 19th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
[He] “is not an ideological person at all…. In the eight years since he left the solicitor general’s office, I don’t think Roberts has filed a single amicus brief for a conservative ideological organization. And I will guarantee that given his prominence, he’s being asked all the time to do so. He just hasn’t played […]
No Comments »
Filed under: politics
Posted on July 19th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
The consensus emerging online seems to be that John Roberts is the long-awaited fourth conservative justice on the Supreme Court, the prize for which the rank-and-file Republican conservatives have been labouring, arguing and compromising away all other principles to achieve. This makes me wonder whether “conservatives” will now find their long, twilight struggle to […]
1 Comment »
Filed under: politics
Posted on July 19th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
President Bush on Tuesday chose federal appeals court judge John G. Roberts Jr. to be the 109th justice of the U.S. Supreme Court and Bush’s first nominee for the high court. The president selected a rock-solid conservative whose nomination could trigger a tumultuous battle over the direction of the nation’s highest court. ~MSNBC
It was good […]
No Comments »
Filed under: politics
Posted on July 19th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
This will very probably be wrong, as we will find out in a few hours, but I have had a sneaking suspicion that the selection for the Court will be John Roberts, who has received relatively little buzz in the media, though his name and profile have been mentioned in some prominent news accounts, and […]
No Comments »
Filed under: politics
Posted on July 19th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
Thus the Orthodox hesitate at a phrase like the pope’s “multiform fullness.” Catholic diversity makes it easy for Catholics to embrace us: When they look at us, they see the early church. We fit right in. But when the Orthodox look at Catholics, we see an extra thousand years of theological development, plus rebellion in […]
No Comments »
Filed under: religion
Posted on July 19th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
Two-thirds of Britons believe there is a link between Tony Blair’s decision to invade Iraq and the London bombings despite government claims to the contrary, according to a Guardian/ICM poll published today.
The poll makes it clear that voters believe further attacks in Britain by suicide bombers are also inevitable, with 75% of those responding saying […]
No Comments »
Filed under: politics
Posted on July 17th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
Too many Europeans are ambivalent, like Livingstone. Terrorists, they figure, are evil; but if their preferred victims are Jews and Americans, how bad can they really be? As Europe prepares its own destruction, it resembles Germany in the early 1930s: Jew-hatred everywhere, on a low boil. ~David Gelernter
No one needs to defend Ken Livingstone or […]
No Comments »
Filed under: politics
Posted on July 16th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
There are those, of course, who argue that biological life has such inherent value that to remove life-support - even in a case such as Maggie’s - is immoral, since it bases the decision on “quality of life” rather than “sanctity of life” criteria. This, however, represents a very un-Christian form of “vitalism” and is […]
No Comments »
Filed under: religion