Posted on December 30th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
Half the nation now believes the war was a mistake and wants U.S. troop withdrawals to begin. But no patriot wants to see Iraq collapse into chaos and civil war, and everything for which 2,100 Americans died and 16,000 suffered washed down a sewer. ~Patrick Buchanan
The phrasing of this last line from a rather odd [...]
3 Comments »
Filed under: politics
Posted on December 30th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
By ‘national interest’ I do not mean such grandly aspirational aims as world peace and democracy. I mean that which directly relates to the wealth, security and liberty of the British people. For instance, the fate of the Croats or Bosnians or Kosovars in the 1990s, or any of the peoples of Africa today, can [...]
No Comments »
Filed under: politics
Posted on December 29th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
I like the idea of self-sufficiency. I’m not opposed to trade, but I am opposed to the kind of economic centralization that makes continental populations dependent on just a handful of corporations for their incomes, their entertainment, and their food. Outside of our large cities, entire towns are employed by one or two employers that [...]
No Comments »
Filed under: politics
Posted on December 29th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
At what level of participation, Brent Scowcroft, can the objective of democratizing a hellhole of Middle Eastern totalitarianism be deemed a partial success? After how many inspiring elections, Howard Dean, can the trope about exporting freedom at the end of a gun be buried? ~Jonathan Gurwitz, MySanAntonio.com
I don’t know who Jonathan Gurwitz is, but I [...]
No Comments »
Filed under: politics
Posted on December 28th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
And few would deny that the American-led demonstration of resolve is related to a movement toward decency and democracy in countries as various as Ukraine and Lebanon, with ripples of hopeful change in Egypt and even Iran and Syria. ~Fr. Richard John Neuhaus
Fr. Neuhaus’ original interview from 2003 is interesting, but more instructive are his [...]
No Comments »
Filed under: politics
Posted on December 28th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
In his opinion, Judge Jones the Third declared:
“The overwhelming evidence is that (intelligent design) is a religious view, a mere re-labeling of creationism and not a scientific theory. . . . It is an extension of the fundamentalists’ view that one must either accept the literal interpretation of Genesis or else believe in the [...]
No Comments »
Filed under: religion
Posted on December 28th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
On the face of it, Mr. Bush’s extraordinary authorisation of warrantless NSA wiretaps is illegal. (Then again, many things Mr. Bush has done are illegal and there has been little attention paid to their illegality.) Viewed as a matter of strict construction, much of what the NSA does is illegal, but even by [...]
No Comments »
Filed under: politics
Posted on December 27th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
The remake of Battlestar Galactica on the Sci-Fi Channel (soon to begin its third season) has prompted a few rather weak attempts to draw parallels between the show and current events or find a political or religious statement in the new version of the amazingly campy cult series of 1978 (which understandably became more popular [...]
No Comments »
Filed under: miscellaneous
Posted on December 27th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
Peter, I agree with you on Jeff Hart’s piece [in today’s Wall Street Journal]. We were in a staff meeting here at the Dallas Morning News, and my editor had to nudge me to get me to put down the Journal and pay attention, so captivating was Jeff’s essay. Crunchy me especially liked this passage: [...]
No Comments »
Filed under: Uncategorized
Posted on December 27th, 2005 by Daniel Larison
In fact, she explains, she liked the way “Islam demands a closeness to God. Islam is simpler, more rigorous, and it’s easier because it is explicit. I was looking for a framework; man needs rules and behavior to follow. Christianity did not give me the same reference points.”
Those reasons reflect many female converts’ thinking, say [...]
No Comments »
Filed under: religion