<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Article In The New TAC; Brilliant Bramwell, Baffling Bramwell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2006/11/04/article-in-the-new-tac-brilliant-bramwell-baffling-bramwell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2006/11/04/article-in-the-new-tac-brilliant-bramwell-baffling-bramwell/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 01:35:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: H. de Sauveterre</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2006/11/04/article-in-the-new-tac-brilliant-bramwell-baffling-bramwell/comment-page-1/#comment-5040</link>
		<dc:creator>H. de Sauveterre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 23:25:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larison.org/2006/11/04/article-in-the-new-tac-brilliant-bramwell-baffling-bramwell/#comment-5040</guid>
		<description>Sir - 

Thank you for such a succinct riposte to Mr Bramwell&#039;s denigration of &quot;ancestral attachments&quot; &amp;c. When I was first sent his article, earlier this week, that was the section that stuck in my craw. You have saved me the time and effort of a formal reply; I only regret that you have denied me the pleasure it would have entailed. 

Kind regards,

Hilaire de Sauveterre</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sir &#8211; </p>
<p>Thank you for such a succinct riposte to Mr Bramwell&#8217;s denigration of &#8220;ancestral attachments&#8221; &amp;c. When I was first sent his article, earlier this week, that was the section that stuck in my craw. You have saved me the time and effort of a formal reply; I only regret that you have denied me the pleasure it would have entailed. </p>
<p>Kind regards,</p>
<p>Hilaire de Sauveterre</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Larison</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2006/11/04/article-in-the-new-tac-brilliant-bramwell-baffling-bramwell/comment-page-1/#comment-4989</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Larison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 21:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larison.org/2006/11/04/article-in-the-new-tac-brilliant-bramwell-baffling-bramwell/#comment-4989</guid>
		<description>I could answer that, but if you read the article you will find the answer to that question as well.  It&#039;s worth reading.  You won&#039;t regret it.  It might annoy you, and you might not agree with all of it, but you will be glad you read it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I could answer that, but if you read the article you will find the answer to that question as well.  It&#8217;s worth reading.  You won&#8217;t regret it.  It might annoy you, and you might not agree with all of it, but you will be glad you read it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scriblerus</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2006/11/04/article-in-the-new-tac-brilliant-bramwell-baffling-bramwell/comment-page-1/#comment-4988</link>
		<dc:creator>scriblerus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Nov 2006 19:57:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larison.org/2006/11/04/article-in-the-new-tac-brilliant-bramwell-baffling-bramwell/#comment-4988</guid>
		<description>This sounds really interesting.  I&#039;ll keep my eyes peeled for it.  My initial thought, though, is that isn&#039;t Bramwell on the board of NR or, at least, one of Buckley&#039;s chosen heirs?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds really interesting.  I&#8217;ll keep my eyes peeled for it.  My initial thought, though, is that isn&#8217;t Bramwell on the board of NR or, at least, one of Buckley&#8217;s chosen heirs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
