<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Famous Tale Of Nancy Boyda, And Other Deceptions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2007/08/08/the-famous-tale-of-nancy-boyda-and-other-deceptions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2007/08/08/the-famous-tale-of-nancy-boyda-and-other-deceptions/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 09:39:05 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Eunomia &#187; For Some Reason, The Tale Of Nancy Boyda Lives On</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2007/08/08/the-famous-tale-of-nancy-boyda-and-other-deceptions/comment-page-1/#comment-12481</link>
		<dc:creator>Eunomia &#187; For Some Reason, The Tale Of Nancy Boyda Lives On</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 23 Jul 2008 01:07:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://larison.org/2007/08/08/the-famous-tale-of-nancy-boyda-and-other-deceptions/#comment-12481</guid>
		<description>[...] Last summer, I noted the numerous references to Nancy Boyda&#8217;s abrupt departure from an Armed Services Committee hearing featuring testimony from Gen. Keane.Â  War supporters kept flogging this as evidence of antiwar Democrats&#8217; intransigence and inflexibility in the face of new evidence.Â  Never mind that Boyda&#8217;s frustration with administration spin on IraqÂ was, is, widely shared, and her gesture, while a tad dramatic, was actually appreciated in many quarters.Â  Now Politico has dredged up the episode in its profile of five at-risk Democratic incumbents (most of whom are freshmen elected to traditionally Republican-leaning districts in &#8216;06) as one of the reasons why Boyda&#8217;s re-electionÂ is at risk.Â  At the heart of this sort ofÂ analysis is a very much inside-the-Beltway assumption that someone&#8217;s opposition to the &#8220;surge&#8221; will prove to beÂ a major liability for Democratic candidates.Â  Just as I am doubtful that obsessing about the &#8220;surge&#8221; will aid McCain, I very much doubt that opposition to it is going to hurt House members.Â Â  [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Last summer, I noted the numerous references to Nancy Boyda&#8217;s abrupt departure from an Armed Services Committee hearing featuring testimony from Gen. Keane.Â  War supporters kept flogging this as evidence of antiwar Democrats&#8217; intransigence and inflexibility in the face of new evidence.Â  Never mind that Boyda&#8217;s frustration with administration spin on IraqÂ was, is, widely shared, and her gesture, while a tad dramatic, was actually appreciated in many quarters.Â  Now Politico has dredged up the episode in its profile of five at-risk Democratic incumbents (most of whom are freshmen elected to traditionally Republican-leaning districts in &#8216;06) as one of the reasons why Boyda&#8217;s re-electionÂ is at risk.Â  At the heart of this sort ofÂ analysis is a very much inside-the-Beltway assumption that someone&#8217;s opposition to the &#8220;surge&#8221; will prove to beÂ a major liability for Democratic candidates.Â  Just as I am doubtful that obsessing about the &#8220;surge&#8221; will aid McCain, I very much doubt that opposition to it is going to hurt House members.Â Â  [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
