From Unclear To Ridiculous
Posted on March 1st, 2008
by Daniel Larison |
|
Since the fall of Baghdad in April 2003, Mr. Bush has left us confused about what the war really is and what it will take to win it. Mr. McCain can undo the confusion, make clear what our goals must be and draw the American people to him. The fight is to protect America and Americans will not hide from that. ~Jed Babbin
As misguided and unrealistic as they are, at least Mr. Bush’s stated goals have some small connection to reality. That is, establishing a self-sustaining, “democratic” Iraqi government capable of defending itself may be a fool’s errand, but the effort does address the reality of the Iraqi government’s impotence and its dependence on our forces. The current policy is the slapdash, make-shift response to the utterly foreseeable (and foreseen) chaos that was going to follow the invasion, but it does at least concern a problem that exists in the real world.
What Mr. Babbin proposes that McCain say is that perpetuating the war in Iraq has something to do with defending America. But even the initial invasion had nothing in reality to do with defending America, since Iraq was no significant threat to our country and would not have been one even if the claims about its weapons programs had been correct. The two arguments against withdrawal are the humanitarian/guilt argument and a regional stability argument, and neither of these is convincing to a majority of the public. Neither is a very compelling reason, since the possibility of post-withdrawal civil strife and mass bloodletting on the one hand and the possibility of a withdrawal generating regional upheaval will never entirely disappear, which means that either argument implies a mission of indefinite duration on a “just in case” basis.
Rhetoric that speaks of an “existential threat” is simply not credible, and anyone who deploys such an over-the-top argument will rapidly lose credibility with everyone outside an intense core of true believers. There is a security threat from jihadists, but even that is not “existential.” “America’s existence” is not at stake in Iraq, and it is rather amazing that people continue to repeat such things at this late date.
free viagra
buy viagra online
generic viagra
how does viagra work
cheap viagra
buy viagra
buy viagra online inurl
viagra 6 free samples
viagra online
viagra for women
viagra side effects
female viagra
natural viagra
online viagra
cheapest viagra prices
herbal viagra
alternative to viagra
buy generic viagra
purchase viagra online
free viagra without prescription
viagra attorneys
free viagra samples before buying
buy generic viagra cheap
viagra uk
generic viagra online
try viagra for free
generic viagra from india
fda approves viagra
free viagra sample
what is better viagra or levitra
discount generic viagra online
viagra cialis levitra
viagra dosage
viagra cheap
viagra on line
best price for viagra
free sample pack of viagra
viagra generic
viagra without prescription
discount viagra
gay viagra
mail order viagra
viagra inurl
generic viagra online paypal
generic viagra overnight
generic viagra online pharmacy
generic viagra uk
buy cheap viagra online uk
suppliers of viagra
how long does viagra last
viagra sex
generic viagra soft tabs
generic viagra 100mg
buy viagra onli
generic viagra online without prescription
viagra energy drink
cheapest uk supplier viagra
viagra cialis
generic viagra safe
viagra professional
viagra sales
viagra free trial pack
viagra lawyers
over the counter viagra
best price for generic viagra
viagra jokes
buying viagra
viagra samples
viagra sample
cialis
generic cialis
cheapest cialis
buy cialis online
buying generic cialis
cialis for order
what are the side effects of cialis
buy generic cialis
what is the generic name for cialis
cheap cialis
cialis online
buy cialis
cialis side effects
how long does cialis last
cialis forum
cialis lawyer ohio
cialis attorneys
cialis attorney columbus
cialis injury lawyer ohio
cialis injury attorney ohio
cialis injury lawyer columbus
prices cialis
cialis lawyers
viagra cialis levitra
cialis lawyer columbus
online generic cialis
daily cialis
cialis injury attorney columbus
cialis attorney ohio
cialis cost
cialis professional
cialis super active
how does cialis work
what does cialis look like
cialis drug
viagra cialis
cialis to buy new zealand
cialis without prescription
free cialis
cialis soft tabs
discount cialis
cialis generic
generic cialis from india
cheap cialis sale online
cialis daily
cialis reviews
cialis generico
how can i take cialis
cheap cialis si
cialis vs viagra
levitra
generic levitra
levitra attorneys
what is better viagra or levitra
viagra cialis levitra
levitra side effects
buy levitra
levitra online
levitra dangers
how does levitra work
levitra lawyers
what is the difference between levitra and viagra
levitra versus viagra
which works better viagra or levitra
buy levitra and overnight shipping
levitra vs viagra
canidan pharmacies levitra
how long does levitra last
viagra cialis levitra
levitra acheter
comprare levitra
levitra ohne rezept
levitra 20mg
levitra senza ricetta
cheapest generic levitra
levitra compra
cheap levitra
levitra overnight
levitra generika
levitra kaufen
Filed under: foreign policy, politics









I don’t think we’d use a “just in case” risk standard to judge whether to prolong a military deployment of this size and type. If we get the country through a next set of elections and the stabilization of relations with its neighbors, we will have met the responsibilities we incurred on invasion. If afterward it reverts to failed state status, it will become a genuine international responsibility, one we help meet but for which we are exclusively responsible.
I think you raise an excellent point re characterizing threats and deciding on responses to them. Had the original strategy been successful in Iraq, we might have gotten by without a discussion of these. We clearly lost the ability to do this effectively in the immediate aftermath of 9/11.
Seriously. Could Babbin’s remark be /any less/ “unclear” w/r/t the questions of “what the war really is and [in particular!] what it will take to win it”? How exactly does one “succeed” in protecting America? How can there possibly be an /end/ to that process? Ugghhh …
The overuse of “existential threats” not only leads us to deplete our limited resources, but also distracts us from the TRUE existential threat: the giant, mutated zombie of Jean-Paul Sartre, against which we are woefully undefended.