<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Thoughts On The Paul Campaign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/03/12/some-thoughts-on-the-paul-campaign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/03/12/some-thoughts-on-the-paul-campaign/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:15:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Zarathustra</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/03/12/some-thoughts-on-the-paul-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-9506</link>
		<dc:creator>Zarathustra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 21:37:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/03/12/some-thoughts-on-the-paul-campaign/#comment-9506</guid>
		<description>Another factor that hurt Ron Paul (and other decent candidates such as Hunter and Tancredo) is the lemming mentality that compels Republican primary voters to rally around a famous &quot;party leader&quot; at the expense of potentially better, but lesser known, candidates. It&#039;s the reason why Rudy Giuliani had 35%+ all throughout 2007 and why McCain eventually won, it&#039;s why Bush won in 2000, and it&#039;s why Dole won in 1996.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another factor that hurt Ron Paul (and other decent candidates such as Hunter and Tancredo) is the lemming mentality that compels Republican primary voters to rally around a famous &#8220;party leader&#8221; at the expense of potentially better, but lesser known, candidates. It&#8217;s the reason why Rudy Giuliani had 35%+ all throughout 2007 and why McCain eventually won, it&#8217;s why Bush won in 2000, and it&#8217;s why Dole won in 1996.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JonSandor</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/03/12/some-thoughts-on-the-paul-campaign/comment-page-1/#comment-9501</link>
		<dc:creator>JonSandor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Mar 2008 19:50:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/03/12/some-thoughts-on-the-paul-campaign/#comment-9501</guid>
		<description>Weigel could have noted that Paul lost badly to McCain even among voters who oppsed the Iraq war. But I suppose that would have underminded his immigration argument.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weigel could have noted that Paul lost badly to McCain even among voters who oppsed the Iraq war. But I suppose that would have underminded his immigration argument.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
