<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Frustrating</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/04/15/frustrating-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/04/15/frustrating-2/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:37:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Josiwe</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/04/15/frustrating-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10035</link>
		<dc:creator>Josiwe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Apr 2008 17:01:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/04/15/frustrating-2/#comment-10035</guid>
		<description>I interpreted his statement quite differently from you. After thinking about it for a while, I came up with this restatement:

Q: Why do small-town voters tend to vote against their own economic interest?

A: Because they have been conditioned to believe that American government works on an either/or tack - free trade with guns, or protectionist socialism with no guns.

Since, after 30 years (or whatever) neither party has seriously addressed these folks&#039; economic concerns, they cling to the ISSUE of guns as one they can score points with in the electoral superbowl that is the Presidential Election.

I don&#039;t think Obama meant these people cling to their guns or religion as a distraction from their economic distress; I think he meant they cling to the issue, despite its irrelevance to their kitchen sink, in much the same way a normally rational citizen might break the law to bury a red sox jersey in the new yankee stadium. They just want their team to win.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I interpreted his statement quite differently from you. After thinking about it for a while, I came up with this restatement:</p>
<p>Q: Why do small-town voters tend to vote against their own economic interest?</p>
<p>A: Because they have been conditioned to believe that American government works on an either/or tack &#8211; free trade with guns, or protectionist socialism with no guns.</p>
<p>Since, after 30 years (or whatever) neither party has seriously addressed these folks&#8217; economic concerns, they cling to the ISSUE of guns as one they can score points with in the electoral superbowl that is the Presidential Election.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t think Obama meant these people cling to their guns or religion as a distraction from their economic distress; I think he meant they cling to the issue, despite its irrelevance to their kitchen sink, in much the same way a normally rational citizen might break the law to bury a red sox jersey in the new yankee stadium. They just want their team to win.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: davegnyc</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/04/15/frustrating-2/comment-page-1/#comment-10021</link>
		<dc:creator>davegnyc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 20:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/04/15/frustrating-2/#comment-10021</guid>
		<description>On subjects other than the Iraq war, while Obama will probably not roll back free trade agreements, it is very doubtful he will push for any more.

McCain, on the other hand, will surely push for them, although he is likely to meet with little success.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On subjects other than the Iraq war, while Obama will probably not roll back free trade agreements, it is very doubtful he will push for any more.</p>
<p>McCain, on the other hand, will surely push for them, although he is likely to meet with little success.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
