<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Nine Ineffectual Habits Of Republican Pandering</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/05/06/the-nine-ineffectual-habits-of-republican-pandering/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/05/06/the-nine-ineffectual-habits-of-republican-pandering/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 18:22:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: cfountain72</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/05/06/the-nine-ineffectual-habits-of-republican-pandering/comment-page-1/#comment-10476</link>
		<dc:creator>cfountain72</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 23:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/05/06/the-nine-ineffectual-habits-of-republican-pandering/#comment-10476</guid>
		<description>As lame as Gingrich&#039;s banal tripe is, I guess this alternative solution, offered by Roger Kaplan of The American Spectator, would be even worse (tip to Stooksbury):

&quot;WHAT IS TO PREVENT US from seizing the oil fields? The U.S. Army can solemnly announce that it will not take a dime from their exploitation beyond operating costs, and surely there are economists who can figure out how to set up a distribution system that will not wreck the world&#039;s oil markets, with all the ramifications that would bring about. I am in particular thinking of what a provisional neo-colonial administration of the Gulf&#039;s oil resources might do to Africa&#039;s booming oil industries. For what it is worth, the European dependence of Russian oil will be lessened by our seizure of the Middle East&#039;s reserves.&quot;

http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13161

This must be a joke, right? No serious publication (you know, with a glossy cover and a subscriber base) would print something so ludicrous, especially in light of what has happened in Iraq and Afghanistan. Is this the belated April Fool&#039;s edition? Can someone be so powermad, so clueless about economics, AND have a job that pays him to type words. And to think, I actually had a subscription myself as a teenager. Thank God for The American Conservative!

Peace be with you. 

ps. Of course, they hate us for our freedoms, don&#039;cha know?!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As lame as Gingrich&#8217;s banal tripe is, I guess this alternative solution, offered by Roger Kaplan of The American Spectator, would be even worse (tip to Stooksbury):</p>
<p>&#8220;WHAT IS TO PREVENT US from seizing the oil fields? The U.S. Army can solemnly announce that it will not take a dime from their exploitation beyond operating costs, and surely there are economists who can figure out how to set up a distribution system that will not wreck the world&#8217;s oil markets, with all the ramifications that would bring about. I am in particular thinking of what a provisional neo-colonial administration of the Gulf&#8217;s oil resources might do to Africa&#8217;s booming oil industries. For what it is worth, the European dependence of Russian oil will be lessened by our seizure of the Middle East&#8217;s reserves.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13161" rel="nofollow">http://www.spectator.org/dsp_article.asp?art_id=13161</a></p>
<p>This must be a joke, right? No serious publication (you know, with a glossy cover and a subscriber base) would print something so ludicrous, especially in light of what has happened in Iraq and Afghanistan. Is this the belated April Fool&#8217;s edition? Can someone be so powermad, so clueless about economics, AND have a job that pays him to type words. And to think, I actually had a subscription myself as a teenager. Thank God for The American Conservative!</p>
<p>Peace be with you. </p>
<p>ps. Of course, they hate us for our freedoms, don&#8217;cha know?!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
