Moving The Bar

Posted on June 3rd, 2008 by Daniel Larison

James restates a common theme:

His triumph is questionable in terms of small-ball politics, but neither you, I, nor the Democratic party should worry much about that. In terms of the American character, it´s an important and refreshing reminder that we can, in fact, raise the bar when it comes to our politicians, and admire the luxury of our own high expectations both conscientiously and confidently.

But there is a caveat:

All of this is ruined, of course, if Obama caves and Hillary slithers onto the ticket.

It seems to me that everyone is getting ahead of themselves.  Tonight Obama will technically “clinch” the nomination by crossing the 2,118 delegate threshold almost regardless of how well or poorly he does in the last two primaries, at which point the Clinton campaign will say, “But, of course, all those Michigan delegates you claim you have aren’t really yours, so you’re not there yet, ha ha!”  This is what Michelle Obama complains about when she talks about how “they move the bar,” but “they” will keep “moving the bar” unless and until Obama cedes to Clinton a spot on the ticket.  What no one has been able to explain to me is how it is that Hillary Clinton, whom these same critics paint in the most lurid colours as the mistress of disorder and the spirit of chaos, will yield now when she refused to yield when it had become essentially mathematically impossible for her to take the pledged delegate lead.  According to her worst detractors, she is the epitome of blind egotism and the lust for power, but now she will step aside for the greater good?  Now that she can more or less reasonably claim to have a popular vote plurality, we’re supposed to believe that she will depart when she would not before?  I must brush up on my Clinton demonology, because it seems to me that you cannot believe that Clinton is a soul-sucking revenant who comes to destroy us all (as her more sympathetic critics have portrayed her this year) and believe that the race is over tonight.  Of course, it could be that she is not quite the nightmarish creature her enemies claim that she is, in which case including her on the ticket not only makes sense but does not compromise any high principles or expectations.     

It will become increasingly clear that for the sake of party unity he will be compelled to choose her, and yet this necessary act will be received by many of his admirers as the complete betrayal of everything he stands for?  Talk about moving the bar!  Not only is he going to be forced into choosing her, but then he will be denounced as a charlatan when he does the only thing that Clinton’s partisans realistically leave open to him.  As a practical matter, if he does not choose her, what just happened on Saturday in settling Florida and Michigan, and Michigan in particular, is going to come back to haunt Obama and could provoke a convention fight that might spell disaster for whichever ticket emerges on the other side.   

Update: As expected, she will never go away.

5 Responses to “Moving The Bar”

  1. I think the general consensus among her critics is that Hillary will do anything she can to advance her own interests – not that she is some insane monster who acts without an agenda, but that she has no conscience about the casualties she might inflict in the pursuit of her interests. This view of Hillary says that she will do what she can to win the nomination until it’s counterproductive to her own interests. The general thinking is that fighting on to the convention, or much beyond tonight, actually hurts her interests, which is why she would cease campaigning – not because she is somehow less willing to fight dirty if she thought it would help her in some way. As for gettting the VP slot, yes, she’ll do whatever she can do get that slot if she thinks it’s in her interests, and not, if she thinks otherwise. If she lays down her battle, it doesn’t mean that she wasn’t the “monster” her critics made her our to be, only that continuing to pursue the nomination at this point is counter to her interests, and that she’s smart enough to finally realize that.

  2. Yes, it’s the fine distinction between extreme narcissism and sociopathology…

  3. Hmmmm….seems that in your eyes, no matter what this candidate does, a disaster is sure to ensue.

  4. The hit piece rumors are coming on strong. Can Hillary be waiting?

    I don’t think it will matter unless they catch obama himself saying something outrageous. Still, it may be giving Hillary hope.
    .

  5. I’ve heard about that “hit piece”. Supposedly it has Michelle saying “why’d he” in some context of criticizing Bush, and some crazed fools are claiming she said “whitey”. Reminds me of the Woody Allen satiric complaint in Annie Hall that anti-semites are always saying “did you?” in a contracted pronunication as “djew”. Except these guys are serious.

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.