http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/07/15/on-bishirjian/ n. the principle of good order<br /><br /> "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman Mon, 22 Mar 2010 13:59:39 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/07/15/on-bishirjian/comment-page-1/#comment-12309 Howard J. Harrison Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:11:34 +0000 http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/07/15/on-bishirjian/#comment-12309 Thank you for the Bishirjian link. It gives one much to think about. Thank you for the Bishirjian link. It gives one much to think about.

]]> http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/07/15/on-bishirjian/comment-page-1/#comment-12289 Paleo myopia? « Upturned Earth || John Schwenkler Wed, 16 Jul 2008 20:23:41 +0000 http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/07/15/on-bishirjian/#comment-12289 [...] Paleo myopia? July 16, 2008, 1:23 pm Filed under: civil liberties, conservatism, economics, government, taxation, war See: Douthat, Larison, Douthat, and Larison. (Will also blogged a few days ago about the essay that set all of this off.) I’d add a few thoughts: [...] [...] Paleo myopia? July 16, 2008, 1:23 pm Filed under: civil liberties, conservatism, economics, government, taxation, war See: Douthat, Larison, Douthat, and Larison. (Will also blogged a few days ago about the essay that set all of this off.) I’d add a few thoughts: [...]

]]> http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/07/15/on-bishirjian/comment-page-1/#comment-12286 Eunomia » On Bishirjian (II) Wed, 16 Jul 2008 19:21:30 +0000 http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/07/15/on-bishirjian/#comment-12286 [...] Ross replies to my earlier post on the Bishirjian essay and Ross’ response to it, and I take his point when he writes: Actually, the fact that Bishirjian’s essay made many theoretical points with which I agreed was precisely why I thought his completely unimaginative, Limbavian proposals for what conservatives ought to actually do were worth highlighting. [...] [...] Ross replies to my earlier post on the Bishirjian essay and Ross’ response to it, and I take his point when he writes: Actually, the fact that Bishirjian’s essay made many theoretical points with which I agreed was precisely why I thought his completely unimaginative, Limbavian proposals for what conservatives ought to actually do were worth highlighting. [...]

]]>