Satire Vlogging
Posted on July 17th, 2008 by Daniel Larison
Digg
Stumble Upon
Newsvine
Slashdot
Mixx
Diigo
Google
Delicious
Reddit
Facebook
Stumble Upon
Newsvine
Mixx
Diigo
Delicious
Reddit
Facebook
Ross and Chris Hayes discuss the New Yorker cover, the Obama campaign and more here.
Filed under: miscellaneous



I was greatly edified by this diavlog on the New Yorker cover story. A little bit discursive, but that was fun too. I saw that your Eunomia posts were linked, Daniel, with some approbation.
I was, in addition, struck by two of their early points: one, timing. The cover would have been actually funny (instead of what it was, either offensive or puzzling) if the editors had elected to run it the week before an Obama inauguration. Two, the cover failed as satire because it was a send-up of a perception. Not only that, but a discredited and noxious right-wing perception that is further beset with internal and fatal inconsistencies–radical Muslims marry Black Panthers?
Both Hayes and Douthat noted that 99 percent of good satire is rooted in a skewering send-up of a person, or one of that person’s traits, as he (it) really is. Herblock, Oliphant, all the greats, get at some ridiculous trait and push it in a way that everyone recognizes in a satisfying intellectual exercise that makes readers say, “Yes! Exactly. He nailed it.”
Their larger discussion of American exceptionalism, as embodied by Obama, was also interesting and generous. I did not get all the way through the long diavlog but can’t recommend it highly enough.