<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Here&#8217;s Some Change For You</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/01/heres-some-change-for-you/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/01/heres-some-change-for-you/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 20:15:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: What John Wanted &#171; Upturned Earth &#124;&#124; John Schwenkler</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/01/heres-some-change-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-13501</link>
		<dc:creator>What John Wanted &#171; Upturned Earth &#124;&#124; John Schwenkler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 05:16:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/01/heres-some-change-for-you/#comment-13501</guid>
		<description>[...] [ADDENDUM: Cf. Henley: It remains to be seen whether Palin is merely as big a fraud as most politicians or a bigger one, but Palin herself is a distraction. And, you know, sheâ€™s not running for President. John McCain is, and as Larison says, John McCain would be everything anyone hated about the Bush years minus the occasional bouts of temperance. Eve and Nat Hentoff (whom she links) wonder if Palin would be &quot;as flip-flopping as Mr. McCain on the Bush torture policy,&quot; which is an odd way to put it. Thereâ€™s no evidence that Palin has a preexisting torture policy to flip away from, let alone what it would be. What there is evidence of is: Sarah Palin is John McCainâ€™s running mate, not the other way around. Sarah Palin and John McCain are running under the aegis of the Republican Party, which has made support for torture a litmus-test issue. Think about it: John McCain would not be the GOP presidential nominee if he had not flip-flopped on torture, because the GOP is a pro-torture institution. Its elites and its mass base insist on the rightness and necessity of torture. It doesnâ€™t even matter what Sarah Palinâ€™s personal opinion is: sheâ€™s not being hired to be the Partyâ€™s conscience on civil liberties and the treatment of prisoners. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] [ADDENDUM: Cf. Henley: It remains to be seen whether Palin is merely as big a fraud as most politicians or a bigger one, but Palin herself is a distraction. And, you know, sheâ€™s not running for President. John McCain is, and as Larison says, John McCain would be everything anyone hated about the Bush years minus the occasional bouts of temperance. Eve and Nat Hentoff (whom she links) wonder if Palin would be "as flip-flopping as Mr. McCain on the Bush torture policy," which is an odd way to put it. Thereâ€™s no evidence that Palin has a preexisting torture policy to flip away from, let alone what it would be. What there is evidence of is: Sarah Palin is John McCainâ€™s running mate, not the other way around. Sarah Palin and John McCain are running under the aegis of the Republican Party, which has made support for torture a litmus-test issue. Think about it: John McCain would not be the GOP presidential nominee if he had not flip-flopped on torture, because the GOP is a pro-torture institution. Its elites and its mass base insist on the rightness and necessity of torture. It doesnâ€™t even matter what Sarah Palinâ€™s personal opinion is: sheâ€™s not being hired to be the Partyâ€™s conscience on civil liberties and the treatment of prisoners. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Strange We Can Believe In &#167; Unqualified Offerings</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/01/heres-some-change-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-13498</link>
		<dc:creator>Strange We Can Believe In &#167; Unqualified Offerings</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 04:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/01/heres-some-change-for-you/#comment-13498</guid>
		<description>[...] conscience on civil liberties and the treatment of prisoners.   Posted by Jim Henley @ 12:24 am, Filed under: Main    &#171; &#171; Coming soon to a SWAT team near you &#124; Main&#124; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] conscience on civil liberties and the treatment of prisoners.   Posted by Jim Henley @ 12:24 am, Filed under: Main    &laquo; &laquo; Coming soon to a SWAT team near you | Main| [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ZackF</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/01/heres-some-change-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-13465</link>
		<dc:creator>ZackF</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 17:14:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/01/heres-some-change-for-you/#comment-13465</guid>
		<description>Oh boy, I am really enjoying these post-vacation Larison guns that are just massacring McCain.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh boy, I am really enjoying these post-vacation Larison guns that are just massacring McCain.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howard J. Harrison</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/01/heres-some-change-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-13462</link>
		<dc:creator>Howard J. Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:55:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/01/heres-some-change-for-you/#comment-13462</guid>
		<description>&lt;em&gt;If you want an idea of what a McCain administration would be like, imagine the last eight years and then remove whatever common sense and competence there has been and you will be close.&lt;/em&gt;

Ouch.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>If you want an idea of what a McCain administration would be like, imagine the last eight years and then remove whatever common sense and competence there has been and you will be close.</em></p>
<p>Ouch.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bustrofedon</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/01/heres-some-change-for-you/comment-page-1/#comment-13459</link>
		<dc:creator>Bustrofedon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 07:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/01/heres-some-change-for-you/#comment-13459</guid>
		<description>Good point although there wasn&#039;t a whole lot of common sense and competence in the Bush Administration, especially in the first five years (the years of the greatest ideological fervor which also coincided with the worst abuses/missteps of Iraq, torture, Katrina plus bankrupting the US). The only reason they have behaved (in relative terms) a little better in the last couple of years is that they have imploded internally due to their own arrogance, mismanagement and stupidity.

McCain probably won&#039;t repeat some of their mistakes - he&#039;ll come up with new ones.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good point although there wasn&#8217;t a whole lot of common sense and competence in the Bush Administration, especially in the first five years (the years of the greatest ideological fervor which also coincided with the worst abuses/missteps of Iraq, torture, Katrina plus bankrupting the US). The only reason they have behaved (in relative terms) a little better in the last couple of years is that they have imploded internally due to their own arrogance, mismanagement and stupidity.</p>
<p>McCain probably won&#8217;t repeat some of their mistakes &#8211; he&#8217;ll come up with new ones.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
