It’s Not The Earmark, It’s The Lying
Posted on September 9th, 2008
by Daniel Larison |
|
But here’s the thing. Even if Palin did initially accept the money [for the bridge], I have a hard time blaming her. As the Governor of Alaska, her job was to spend Alaska’s taxpayer dollars responsibly, not federal tax dollars. I have no problem with a state governor taking any money Congress wants to throw their way. I do have a problem with Congress giving money away stupidly. ~Amber Bryer-Wotte
That’s almost beside the point in this case. The two people most preoccupied with casting blame in connection with earmarks are McCain and Palin (they were just using this to needle Obama the other day), and they have opted for some reason to make her into an anti-earmark crusader as proof of her “reform” credentials. The GOP candidates are the ones who want to make the earmark “game” a central issue of the campaign, while simultaneously pretending that the fresh outsider member of the ticket had nothing to do with said “game.” To that end, they have repeatedly made false and misleading statements about her actual record on the bridge and her willingness to accept earmarked funds. If Palin was simply taking advantage of a broken system, there’s not much reason to be outraged by that, but there is good reason to take issue with her decision to engage in a pattern of deceiving the public about her record, which she has clearly done in the hopes that her past obscurity will shield her from being held to account for making false claims. More to the point, once you strip away the hostility to earmarks Palin’s “reform” credentials become pretty thin, and the more it becomes apparent that adding Palin to the ticket really was as much of a P.R. stunt as the critics said it was.
For my part, I think the Republican preoccupation with earmark reform reveals a truly bizarre view of what is wrong with the federal government and how its dysfunction might best be fixed, as if pork-barrel spending were the main problem with Republican governance over the last decade. Still, this is the field where McCain and Palin have chosen to fight, and this is what they are choosing to lie about, so it seems fair that they pay some political price for that.
Filed under: politics
3 Responses to “It’s Not The Earmark, It’s The Lying”
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.










” it seems fair that they pay some political price for that.”
What political price would that be? And who is going to make them pay for it? I agree that on the long, long, long list of horrible things this government has done, “earmarking” is pretty small beer. Is Obama, of all people, really going to have any credibility at this point holding anyone’s feet to the fire on the charge of changing positions?
It strikes me that a “reform” ticket that engages in sustained deception of the public as part of its effort to make the claim that they are the “reform” ticket will lose all credibility if they keep repeating this lie. I’m not sure whether the press and the Obama campaign (which are more or less two heads of the same creature at this point) can use this to undermine their credibility, but they certainly deserve sustained criticism for their effort at deception.
[...] deaths … No Comments so far Leave a comment RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URI Leave a comment Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTMLallowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong> [...]