<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: They Are The Champions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/15/they-are-the-champions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/15/they-are-the-champions/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: George42</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/15/they-are-the-champions/comment-page-1/#comment-13973</link>
		<dc:creator>George42</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 03:42:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/09/15/they-are-the-champions/#comment-13973</guid>
		<description>&quot;This is one reason why social conservatives, who seem to be more inclined to vote on the basis of shared &#039;values&#039; than other conservatives, are such a large constituency that gets so little in exchange for their support.&quot;

If you read Chris Hayes&#039; very interesting article on the mind of the undecided voter (to which Reihan links in this post: http://www.theamericanscene.com/2008/01/17/undecided ), this doesn&#039;t seem so weird.  As Hayes points out, many voters (probably more than just the undecided ones) don&#039;t really think in terms of &quot;issues&quot; because they have &quot;a fundamental lack of understanding of what constitute[s] the broad category of the &#039;political.&#039;&quot;  If you don&#039;t really understand politics, then you have no idea what a candidate might plausibly do with his office once he gets elected, and you are more likely to be swayed by the &quot;he shares my values&quot; pitch, and less likely to be disappointed if nothing particularly good comes from his election to office.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;This is one reason why social conservatives, who seem to be more inclined to vote on the basis of shared &#8216;values&#8217; than other conservatives, are such a large constituency that gets so little in exchange for their support.&#8221;</p>
<p>If you read Chris Hayes&#8217; very interesting article on the mind of the undecided voter (to which Reihan links in this post: <a href="http://www.theamericanscene.com/2008/01/17/undecided" rel="nofollow">http://www.theamericanscene.com/2008/01/17/undecided</a> ), this doesn&#8217;t seem so weird.  As Hayes points out, many voters (probably more than just the undecided ones) don&#8217;t really think in terms of &#8220;issues&#8221; because they have &#8220;a fundamental lack of understanding of what constitute[s] the broad category of the &#8216;political.&#8217;&#8221;  If you don&#8217;t really understand politics, then you have no idea what a candidate might plausibly do with his office once he gets elected, and you are more likely to be swayed by the &#8220;he shares my values&#8221; pitch, and less likely to be disappointed if nothing particularly good comes from his election to office.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
