<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Some Sanity On The Financial Crisis</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Mar 2010 07:04:49 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: angela</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-15500</link>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2008 13:23:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/#comment-15500</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The 1% federal funds rate stoked greed, but that didnâ€™t mean that banks had to start issuing loans with no money down, no documentation.&lt;/i&gt;

Actually, they did on several levels.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The 1% federal funds rate stoked greed, but that didnâ€™t mean that banks had to start issuing loans with no money down, no documentation.</i></p>
<p>Actually, they did on several levels.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indya</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-15132</link>
		<dc:creator>Indya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 21:04:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/#comment-15132</guid>
		<description>Did you not read the next sentence?  

&lt;i&gt;The 1% federal funds rate stoked greed, but that didnâ€™t mean that banks had to start issuing loans with no money down, no documentation.&lt;/i&gt;

Nowhere did anyone put a gun to their heads and say, &quot;take no-doc loans!!&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Did you not read the next sentence?  </p>
<p><i>The 1% federal funds rate stoked greed, but that didnâ€™t mean that banks had to start issuing loans with no money down, no documentation.</i></p>
<p>Nowhere did anyone put a gun to their heads and say, &#8220;take no-doc loans!!&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angela</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-15130</link>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 20:38:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/#comment-15130</guid>
		<description>&quot;The rate setting has nothing to do with the kind of bad underwriting practices that went on..... &quot;

Absolutely it did!  SImply put, lower rates means that banks have to loan more money in order to achieve the same returns. 

This mortgage market collapse isn&#039;t the cause of our economic problems...it is only a symptom.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The rate setting has nothing to do with the kind of bad underwriting practices that went on&#8230;.. &#8221;</p>
<p>Absolutely it did!  SImply put, lower rates means that banks have to loan more money in order to achieve the same returns. </p>
<p>This mortgage market collapse isn&#8217;t the cause of our economic problems&#8230;it is only a symptom.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indya</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-15102</link>
		<dc:creator>Indya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 05:44:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/#comment-15102</guid>
		<description>I would say it&#039;s moral hazard more than anything else.  It is insane.  Tom Toles has a perfect cartoon for this.

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/opinions/cartoonsandvideos/toles_main.html?name=Toles&amp;date=10082008&amp;type=c

You are correct to bring up the foreign markets - in truth, that is the reason why anyone would even think about putting 700B or 1T toward the bailout.  The debt would bankrupt us indeed if all the foreign investment left the US.  But we&#039;re not alone in this credit crisis - the entire system is structured to make money on other people&#039;s money.  It&#039;s not just us dependent on loans to subsidize a higher standard of living.  It is the modern business model - leverage.  It&#039;s insane that the financial industry was so heavily leveraged.  Who saves up and buys things on cash anymore?

The dollar hegemony is on its deathbed, indeed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would say it&#8217;s moral hazard more than anything else.  It is insane.  Tom Toles has a perfect cartoon for this.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/opinions/cartoonsandvideos/toles_main.html?name=Toles&amp;date=10082008&amp;type=c" rel="nofollow">http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-srv/opinions/cartoonsandvideos/toles_main.html?name=Toles&amp;date=10082008&amp;type=c</a></p>
<p>You are correct to bring up the foreign markets &#8211; in truth, that is the reason why anyone would even think about putting 700B or 1T toward the bailout.  The debt would bankrupt us indeed if all the foreign investment left the US.  But we&#8217;re not alone in this credit crisis &#8211; the entire system is structured to make money on other people&#8217;s money.  It&#8217;s not just us dependent on loans to subsidize a higher standard of living.  It is the modern business model &#8211; leverage.  It&#8217;s insane that the financial industry was so heavily leveraged.  Who saves up and buys things on cash anymore?</p>
<p>The dollar hegemony is on its deathbed, indeed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBraunstein</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-15100</link>
		<dc:creator>JBraunstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 05:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/#comment-15100</guid>
		<description>Indya, Those bad lending practices can only be explained by coercion, moral hazard and other perverse incentives, or an inexplicable, insane disregard on the part of managers and executives, overcome with &quot;animal spirits&quot;, for the financial health of their companies.  I have trouble swallowing the last one.  The first two seem more likely.

We also shouldn&#039;t forget about foreign countries lending us incredible amounts of money to finance our consumption-on-credit way of life.  Without the post-WWII dollar standard for global security detail quid pro quo, our entire modern lifestyle would never have been possible. 

 And when the global financial system abandons the dollar standard, things will never be the same.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Indya, Those bad lending practices can only be explained by coercion, moral hazard and other perverse incentives, or an inexplicable, insane disregard on the part of managers and executives, overcome with &#8220;animal spirits&#8221;, for the financial health of their companies.  I have trouble swallowing the last one.  The first two seem more likely.</p>
<p>We also shouldn&#8217;t forget about foreign countries lending us incredible amounts of money to finance our consumption-on-credit way of life.  Without the post-WWII dollar standard for global security detail quid pro quo, our entire modern lifestyle would never have been possible. </p>
<p> And when the global financial system abandons the dollar standard, things will never be the same.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indya</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-15095</link>
		<dc:creator>Indya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 03:38:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/#comment-15095</guid>
		<description>The rate setting has nothing to do with the kind of bad underwriting practices that went on.  The 1% federal funds rate stoked greed, but that didn&#039;t mean that banks had to start issuing loans with no money down, no documentation.  Forget the interest only ARMs and other hooziewhatsits.  If they cared about getting their money back, they would have at least taken documentation of income.  You cannot blame &quot;the market&quot; for this practice.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The rate setting has nothing to do with the kind of bad underwriting practices that went on.  The 1% federal funds rate stoked greed, but that didn&#8217;t mean that banks had to start issuing loans with no money down, no documentation.  Forget the interest only ARMs and other hooziewhatsits.  If they cared about getting their money back, they would have at least taken documentation of income.  You cannot blame &#8220;the market&#8221; for this practice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBraunstein</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-15093</link>
		<dc:creator>JBraunstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 03:22:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/#comment-15093</guid>
		<description>Also, I think it&#039;s a misnomer to call this a &quot;mortgage crisis&quot;,  just as the 2000 downturn was not the result of an &quot;internet crisis&quot;...

This is a money and banking crisis, as has been true of most economic bubble trouble in history.

Don&#039;t blame the athlete when the steroids are shoved down his throat.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, I think it&#8217;s a misnomer to call this a &#8220;mortgage crisis&#8221;,  just as the 2000 downturn was not the result of an &#8220;internet crisis&#8221;&#8230;</p>
<p>This is a money and banking crisis, as has been true of most economic bubble trouble in history.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t blame the athlete when the steroids are shoved down his throat.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JBraunstein</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-15092</link>
		<dc:creator>JBraunstein</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Oct 2008 03:07:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/#comment-15092</guid>
		<description>Exactly--If more people understood that the Fed basically fixes the price of money, it shouldn&#039;t be too hard to connect that with the well known econ 101 general wisdom that price controls produce gluts and shortages by prohibiting market forces of real supply and demand from calibrating prices that reflect reality.  So, DUH, you will get artificial booms and busts in capital accumulation.  Not rocket science, folks.

No one should be suprised that a Wizard of Oz-based money economy is intrinsically unstable and perpetually weeks away from implosion.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Exactly&#8211;If more people understood that the Fed basically fixes the price of money, it shouldn&#8217;t be too hard to connect that with the well known econ 101 general wisdom that price controls produce gluts and shortages by prohibiting market forces of real supply and demand from calibrating prices that reflect reality.  So, DUH, you will get artificial booms and busts in capital accumulation.  Not rocket science, folks.</p>
<p>No one should be suprised that a Wizard of Oz-based money economy is intrinsically unstable and perpetually weeks away from implosion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: angela</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-15071</link>
		<dc:creator>angela</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:42:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/#comment-15071</guid>
		<description>I am going to drag this down to Econ 101 levels. 
 
A free market corrects itself.
 
Bernanke and Greenspan spent the last 10 years lowering rates every time the stock market tried to correct even slightly.

Therefore, America is not a free market.

All that other stuff - hedge funds, mortgage crisis,greed, excess, fraud...only symptoms of the core issue.

At the core? Price controls create shortages.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am going to drag this down to Econ 101 levels. </p>
<p>A free market corrects itself.</p>
<p>Bernanke and Greenspan spent the last 10 years lowering rates every time the stock market tried to correct even slightly.</p>
<p>Therefore, America is not a free market.</p>
<p>All that other stuff &#8211; hedge funds, mortgage crisis,greed, excess, fraud&#8230;only symptoms of the core issue.</p>
<p>At the core? Price controls create shortages.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Indya</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-15069</link>
		<dc:creator>Indya</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 18:04:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/#comment-15069</guid>
		<description>I would agree, rawshark.  Barry Ritholtz has an interesting take on this:

http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/10/misunderstandin.html

&quot;The CRA is not remotely one of the proximate causes of the current credit crunch, Housing collapse,and mortgage debacle. As I detailed in Barron&#039;s, there is plenty of things to be angry at D.C. about -- but this ain&#039;t one of them.

If you were to ask me to reveal the prime causative factor for the Housing boom, I would point you to Fed Chairman Greenspan taking rates to 1%, and then leaving them there for a year. The prime factor in the bust was nonfeasance on the Fed&#039;s part in supervising bank lending, allowing banks to give money to people who couldn&#039;t possibly pay it back.&quot;

We should take care to put blame where it belongs.  The kinds of loans under the CRA program only constitute at most 25% of the loans involved in this crisis.  It is primarily greed, laziness and people looking the other way on these things, and the eventual inability to regulate these CDOs and CDSs at all (thanks, Senator Gramm).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would agree, rawshark.  Barry Ritholtz has an interesting take on this:</p>
<p><a href="http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/10/misunderstandin.html" rel="nofollow">http://bigpicture.typepad.com/comments/2008/10/misunderstandin.html</a></p>
<p>&#8220;The CRA is not remotely one of the proximate causes of the current credit crunch, Housing collapse,and mortgage debacle. As I detailed in Barron&#8217;s, there is plenty of things to be angry at D.C. about &#8212; but this ain&#8217;t one of them.</p>
<p>If you were to ask me to reveal the prime causative factor for the Housing boom, I would point you to Fed Chairman Greenspan taking rates to 1%, and then leaving them there for a year. The prime factor in the bust was nonfeasance on the Fed&#8217;s part in supervising bank lending, allowing banks to give money to people who couldn&#8217;t possibly pay it back.&#8221;</p>
<p>We should take care to put blame where it belongs.  The kinds of loans under the CRA program only constitute at most 25% of the loans involved in this crisis.  It is primarily greed, laziness and people looking the other way on these things, and the eventual inability to regulate these CDOs and CDSs at all (thanks, Senator Gramm).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: rawshark</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-15059</link>
		<dc:creator>rawshark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 16:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/#comment-15059</guid>
		<description>Daniel please, this happened because no one was watching. It&#039;s not about low interest loans being forced on banks by the gov&#039;t. It&#039;s about greed. Banks made those laons because they were able to make money doing so not because the fed forced them. They came up with new interest schemes so they can get more people into higher loans that have higher returns so they can sell them faster on wall street. If someone was watching or if Congress had decided back in the 90s that CDS should be publicly traded this wouldn&#039;t have happened. Follow Elvis&#039; link to the NPR podcast 355, then listen to podcast 365 which is a follow up. Listen to the reasons given by Congress for why the CDS market should be allowed to stay private. Then post an update.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daniel please, this happened because no one was watching. It&#8217;s not about low interest loans being forced on banks by the gov&#8217;t. It&#8217;s about greed. Banks made those laons because they were able to make money doing so not because the fed forced them. They came up with new interest schemes so they can get more people into higher loans that have higher returns so they can sell them faster on wall street. If someone was watching or if Congress had decided back in the 90s that CDS should be publicly traded this wouldn&#8217;t have happened. Follow Elvis&#8217; link to the NPR podcast 355, then listen to podcast 365 which is a follow up. Listen to the reasons given by Congress for why the CDS market should be allowed to stay private. Then post an update.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elvis Elvisberg</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-15057</link>
		<dc:creator>Elvis Elvisberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:36:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/#comment-15057</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;The Fed and its Chairman had a lot to do with facilitating the mess&lt;/i&gt;

Absolutely true.  We wouldn&#039;t be in this position if Paul Krugman had been chairman.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>The Fed and its Chairman had a lot to do with facilitating the mess</i></p>
<p>Absolutely true.  We wouldn&#8217;t be in this position if Paul Krugman had been chairman.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc200</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-15053</link>
		<dc:creator>marc200</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/#comment-15053</guid>
		<description>As backup to my claim that dozens of hedge funds have gone under, check out the &lt;a href=&quot;http://hf-implode.com/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt; hedge fund implode-o-meter &lt;/a&gt;. 84 hedge funds going bankrupt since mid-2007.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As backup to my claim that dozens of hedge funds have gone under, check out the <a href="http://hf-implode.com/" rel="nofollow"> hedge fund implode-o-meter </a>. 84 hedge funds going bankrupt since mid-2007.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: marc200</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-15051</link>
		<dc:creator>marc200</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:02:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/#comment-15051</guid>
		<description>sorry, I love your writing normally, but this hedge fund stuff is real nonsense. Bear Stearns was dragged down by the failure of two hedge funds! 

Dozens of hedge funds have gone under in the last year. I expect more will soon. Because the funds are so totally unregulated, we know effectively nothing about what hedge funds bought or how much vulnerability they have. (In other words, Mallaby is lying when he implies any knowledge of whether funds bought bad assets).

Finally, hedge funds were counterparties on lots of these bad assets. If, for the sake of argument, it eventually turns out that they sold lots of crap to others, helping drag down the whole system, but were smart enough to avoid buying it themselves, is that good?

What you&#039;re right about is that government policy was very complicit in this. But it&#039;s more about the Fed flooding the economy with easy money then about Fannie and Freddie, who were not at the center of this. (They joined the subprime party quite late (2005-06), using as an excuse that the private sector was already fully behind this stuff).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorry, I love your writing normally, but this hedge fund stuff is real nonsense. Bear Stearns was dragged down by the failure of two hedge funds! </p>
<p>Dozens of hedge funds have gone under in the last year. I expect more will soon. Because the funds are so totally unregulated, we know effectively nothing about what hedge funds bought or how much vulnerability they have. (In other words, Mallaby is lying when he implies any knowledge of whether funds bought bad assets).</p>
<p>Finally, hedge funds were counterparties on lots of these bad assets. If, for the sake of argument, it eventually turns out that they sold lots of crap to others, helping drag down the whole system, but were smart enough to avoid buying it themselves, is that good?</p>
<p>What you&#8217;re right about is that government policy was very complicit in this. But it&#8217;s more about the Fed flooding the economy with easy money then about Fannie and Freddie, who were not at the center of this. (They joined the subprime party quite late (2005-06), using as an excuse that the private sector was already fully behind this stuff).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Virgil Caine</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/comment-page-1/#comment-15050</link>
		<dc:creator>Virgil Caine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 14:58:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/10/08/some-sanity-on-the-financial-crisis/#comment-15050</guid>
		<description>America) But what galls me is Mallaby and other cheerleaders for the current 5Can anyone explain to me how Mallaby, Llosa and Bobo Brooks can be so cocksure the hedgehogs are sitting pretty right now? (Maybe their moonlighting with econometric regression models and scribbling pro bono publico, but I doubt it somehow) Chicago Tribune just ran a piece on the Harvard MBA wunderkind who founded a leading hedge fund, Citadel Capital Management, and he and his firm&#039;s Icarus impersonation of late. Not to mention the LTC disaster, which was the mother of all deregulation calamities that necessitated our tax dollars outflowing to save the 2big2fail and (and of course the Dow) in what some argue was the blueprint for the new People&#039;s Republi of Wall Street. I thought one of the virtues of hedge funds is their imperviousness to meddlesome SEC examiners and other statist losers: i.e., they let us know how they&#039;re doing, as LTC did, when they&#039;re good and ready.

 Don&#039;t get me wrong, I&#039;m with you on Fannie and Freddie needing to have been taken out back behind the barn like Steinbeck&#039;s Lennie years ago. (Putting all my cards on the table, Wright Patman was way ahead of you on the same being done to the unconsitutional monstrosity of 1913 that Wilson and Col. House foisted on post-Morgan  year plan&#039;s) 

 What galls me is the likes of Mallaby and Brooks current pivot to &quot;regulation is the problem&quot;, which is as mendacious as what you rightly accuse MyFriends McCain of doing. They have no problem with regulation as long as it is used to benefit those  whose bidding they do. Screw everbody else. Which, according to Barton Bigg&#039;s &quot;Hedgehog&quot;, is the raison d&#039;etre of all those rugged John Galts out there bucaneering from Bermuda to San Moritz. There are no heros in this tragedy. Not even the hedgehogs and especially not there little mouthpieces in DC.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>America) But what galls me is Mallaby and other cheerleaders for the current 5Can anyone explain to me how Mallaby, Llosa and Bobo Brooks can be so cocksure the hedgehogs are sitting pretty right now? (Maybe their moonlighting with econometric regression models and scribbling pro bono publico, but I doubt it somehow) Chicago Tribune just ran a piece on the Harvard MBA wunderkind who founded a leading hedge fund, Citadel Capital Management, and he and his firm&#8217;s Icarus impersonation of late. Not to mention the LTC disaster, which was the mother of all deregulation calamities that necessitated our tax dollars outflowing to save the 2big2fail and (and of course the Dow) in what some argue was the blueprint for the new People&#8217;s Republi of Wall Street. I thought one of the virtues of hedge funds is their imperviousness to meddlesome SEC examiners and other statist losers: i.e., they let us know how they&#8217;re doing, as LTC did, when they&#8217;re good and ready.</p>
<p> Don&#8217;t get me wrong, I&#8217;m with you on Fannie and Freddie needing to have been taken out back behind the barn like Steinbeck&#8217;s Lennie years ago. (Putting all my cards on the table, Wright Patman was way ahead of you on the same being done to the unconsitutional monstrosity of 1913 that Wilson and Col. House foisted on post-Morgan  year plan&#8217;s) </p>
<p> What galls me is the likes of Mallaby and Brooks current pivot to &#8220;regulation is the problem&#8221;, which is as mendacious as what you rightly accuse MyFriends McCain of doing. They have no problem with regulation as long as it is used to benefit those  whose bidding they do. Screw everbody else. Which, according to Barton Bigg&#8217;s &#8220;Hedgehog&#8221;, is the raison d&#8217;etre of all those rugged John Galts out there bucaneering from Bermuda to San Moritz. There are no heros in this tragedy. Not even the hedgehogs and especially not there little mouthpieces in DC.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
