<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Brennan</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/11/15/brennan/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/11/15/brennan/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Daniel Larison</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/11/15/brennan/comment-page-1/#comment-18850</link>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Larison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 17:45:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=7627#comment-18850</guid>
		<description>It would be straightforward, except that Mr. Bush also publicly affirmed that &quot;we don&#039;t torture&quot; when, in fact, the government had authorized doing exactly that.  I don&#039;t assume that Obama is engaging in the same twisting of definitions when he makes his statements on this, but this is something that I will believe when I see action and not before. 

His appointments or likely appointments tell us something about what his priorities are.  Obviously, he&#039;s going to be in charge and he will tell them what they&#039;re going to do, but if he appoints Brennan to either of these posts you do have to assume that Obama has no serious interest in revisiting the FISA debate.  I am less concerned that Obama will backtrack on interrogation procedures.  If Brennan were not his top intelligence advisor in the campaign, I wouldn&#039;t be very concerned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It would be straightforward, except that Mr. Bush also publicly affirmed that &#8220;we don&#8217;t torture&#8221; when, in fact, the government had authorized doing exactly that.  I don&#8217;t assume that Obama is engaging in the same twisting of definitions when he makes his statements on this, but this is something that I will believe when I see action and not before. </p>
<p>His appointments or likely appointments tell us something about what his priorities are.  Obviously, he&#8217;s going to be in charge and he will tell them what they&#8217;re going to do, but if he appoints Brennan to either of these posts you do have to assume that Obama has no serious interest in revisiting the FISA debate.  I am less concerned that Obama will backtrack on interrogation procedures.  If Brennan were not his top intelligence advisor in the campaign, I wouldn&#8217;t be very concerned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: conradg</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2008/11/15/brennan/comment-page-1/#comment-18816</link>
		<dc:creator>conradg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Nov 2008 11:06:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=7627#comment-18816</guid>
		<description>All these efforts to read the tea leaves of various Obama advisors&#039; histories to discern what his policies will be seem rather premature and almost useless. What do you think of Obama&#039;s simple statement on 60 minutes last night that his administration will &quot;make sure we don&#039;t torture&quot; as &quot;part and parcel of an effort to regain America&#039;s moral stature in the world.&quot;? Seems pretty straightforward, doesn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>All these efforts to read the tea leaves of various Obama advisors&#8217; histories to discern what his policies will be seem rather premature and almost useless. What do you think of Obama&#8217;s simple statement on 60 minutes last night that his administration will &#8220;make sure we don&#8217;t torture&#8221; as &#8220;part and parcel of an effort to regain America&#8217;s moral stature in the world.&#8221;? Seems pretty straightforward, doesn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
