<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why Prevailing Wisdom Prevails, Even When It Isn&#8217;t Wise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2009/03/16/why-prevailing-wisdom-prevails-even-when-it-isnt-wise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2009/03/16/why-prevailing-wisdom-prevails-even-when-it-isnt-wise/</link>
	<description>n. the principle of good order&#60;br /&#62;&#60;br /&#62; "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: bayesian</title>
		<link>http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2009/03/16/why-prevailing-wisdom-prevails-even-when-it-isnt-wise/comment-page-1/#comment-30896</link>
		<dc:creator>bayesian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Mar 2009 04:02:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=8902#comment-30896</guid>
		<description>Reading Dienstag&#039;s Pessimism (which I bought largely based on your series of posts, sir;  Dienstag got one fair sized piece in the LA Times but IMHO it wasn&#039;t very good) _did_ change how I look at the world, as has for that matter reading Eunomia itself.

Thanks to you again for that series.

Reading Taleb much less so because he simply reinforced what I already knew - Taleb&#039;s writing contributing to my confirmation bias would be ironic if I wanted to misuse the word.

IME &quot;Disillusionment with conventional views seems to me to be a much rarer experience than falling [ever further] under the spell of conventional ideas.&quot;  The cognitive load and material/political cost of swimming against the tide (of whichever particular set of conventional ideas an individual has adopted) increases with age, whereas somehow we become more and more adept at ignoring contradictory information.  In proper Orwellian fashion, almost all the ignoring happens subconsciously, of course.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading Dienstag&#8217;s Pessimism (which I bought largely based on your series of posts, sir;  Dienstag got one fair sized piece in the LA Times but IMHO it wasn&#8217;t very good) _did_ change how I look at the world, as has for that matter reading Eunomia itself.</p>
<p>Thanks to you again for that series.</p>
<p>Reading Taleb much less so because he simply reinforced what I already knew &#8211; Taleb&#8217;s writing contributing to my confirmation bias would be ironic if I wanted to misuse the word.</p>
<p>IME &#8220;Disillusionment with conventional views seems to me to be a much rarer experience than falling [ever further] under the spell of conventional ideas.&#8221;  The cognitive load and material/political cost of swimming against the tide (of whichever particular set of conventional ideas an individual has adopted) increases with age, whereas somehow we become more and more adept at ignoring contradictory information.  In proper Orwellian fashion, almost all the ignoring happens subconsciously, of course.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
