Comments on: On Parsi http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2009/11/03/on-parsi/ n. the principle of good order<br /><br /> "Observe the strange inversion of all order and sense! Dignity debased; how vilely is the function of a consul prostituted!" ~The Craftsman Fri, 19 Mar 2010 18:07:30 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.1 hourly 1 By: Imzak http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2009/11/03/on-parsi/comment-page-1/#comment-34070 Imzak Thu, 05 Nov 2009 13:56:33 +0000 http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=10243#comment-34070 Sullivan and his propagandist types are nothing but shills for the Zionist state. Only a dishonest hypocrite would support an apartheid state with nukes and not support a true albeit imperfect religious democracy with nukes. It's laughable that Sullivan actually believes that Obama's empty words in Cairo started the Green revolution. You would also have to be extremely naive and stupid to believe that the CIA did not have a hand in the uprising in Tehran. The majority of the Iranians do not support the Greens because they were destructive, not the peaceful protesters that the Western media made them to be. Did you really expect the Basij to hold back while a bunch of students burned buses, shops, and private property? The Basij and the Revolutionary Guards, in fact showed utmost restraint when they dealt with these violent terrorists. The majority of the Iranians also support Ahmadinejad and the Marja Khamanei. This was shown in a recent poll by WPO, over 80% support for Ahmadinejad and Khamanei. Furthermore, the Greens, Mousavi do not want to change the Islamic character of the Iranian government. So no dictatorial Shah and no secular democracy, much to the chagrin of Sullivan and the irrelevant Iranians who live in the West. Sullivan and his propagandist types are nothing but shills for the Zionist state. Only a dishonest hypocrite would support an apartheid state with nukes and not support a true albeit imperfect religious democracy with nukes. It’s laughable that Sullivan actually believes that Obama’s empty words in Cairo started the Green revolution.

You would also have to be extremely naive and stupid to believe that the CIA did not have a hand in the uprising in Tehran.

The majority of the Iranians do not support the Greens because they were destructive, not the peaceful protesters that the Western media made them to be. Did you really expect the Basij to hold back while a bunch of students burned buses, shops, and private property? The Basij and the Revolutionary Guards, in fact showed utmost restraint when they dealt with these violent terrorists.

The majority of the Iranians also support Ahmadinejad and the Marja Khamanei. This was shown in a recent poll by WPO, over 80% support for Ahmadinejad and Khamanei.

Furthermore, the Greens, Mousavi do not want to change the Islamic character of the Iranian government. So no dictatorial Shah and no secular democracy, much to the chagrin of Sullivan and the irrelevant Iranians who live in the West.

]]> By: Peter J. Lynch http://www.amconmag.com/larison/2009/11/03/on-parsi/comment-page-1/#comment-34047 Peter J. Lynch Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:16:43 +0000 http://www.amconmag.com/larison/?p=10243#comment-34047 It seems to me that "false and reprehensible" could describe Goldberg's entire oeuvre. Take this gem from 2002: "I believe that the coming invasion of Iraq will be remembered as an act of profound morality." It seems to me that “false and reprehensible” could describe Goldberg’s entire oeuvre. Take this gem from 2002: “I believe that the coming invasion of Iraq will be remembered as an act of profound morality.”

]]>